Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: -COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ] (Christopher) Hey Bruce, You probably should add 'Dump LOB comments in custom dump format' to the todo. That's the last part of that task above which I haven't done yet, and

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
-COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ] (Christopher) Hey Bruce, You probably should add 'Dump LOB comments in custom dump format' to the todo. That's the last part of that task above which I haven't done yet, and for various reasons probably won't have

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
ow wrote: Hi, Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list) -Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin) -COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ] (Christopher) -Have psql \dn show only visible temp schemas using current_schemas()

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: ow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list) If you think the TODO list has *anything* to do with release planning, you fundamentally misunderstand the way things are done around here. The TODO list is a list of things that

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-19 Thread Jan Wieck
Christopher Browne wrote: 2. Jan Wieck's work on SLONY-1 Many are keen to see the code, but it's not out yet. And it is not self-evident that it will necessarily be ready to release in conjunction with 7.5 (Not to say it _can't_ happen, but just that we'll see the code

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-19 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:12:28AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote: and cons, none is the one size that fits all magic solution. To select Does anyone realy believe that there can be a one size fits all solution? Heck, even Oracle and IBM offer a couple of different systems, depending on what you need.

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-19 Thread David Garamond
Andrew Sullivan wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:12:28AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote: and cons, none is the one size that fits all magic solution. To select Does anyone realy believe that there can be a one size fits all solution? Heck, even Oracle and IBM offer a couple of different systems,

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-18 Thread Stephen
Any chance we'll see the VACUUM delay patch (throttle) get into 7.5? I only had the chance to try the first patch by Tom Lane and it was very good already. I was hoping it gets into 7.4.1 but it didn't. :-( I really need the VACUUM delay patch because my servers are begging to die every time

Re: VACUUM delay (was Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?)

2004-01-14 Thread Jan Wieck
Tom Lane wrote: Christopher Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Any chance we'll see the VACUUM delay patch (throttle) get into 7.5? The hope, in 7.5, is to have ARC, which is the super-duper-duper version, working. Actually, I'm not sure that ARC should be

VACUUM delay (was Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?)

2004-01-13 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Any chance we'll see the VACUUM delay patch (throttle) get into 7.5? The hope, in 7.5, is to have ARC, which is the super-duper-duper version, working. Actually, I'm not sure that ARC should be considered to

[HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-12 Thread ow
Hi, Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list) -Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin) -COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ] (Christopher) -Have psql \dn show only visible temp schemas using current_schemas() -Have psql '\i

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-12 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Native Win32 is planned for it (whether it makes it or not is another question, but it is the goal) ... On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, ow wrote: Hi, Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list) -Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin) -COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION |

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-12 Thread Martin Marques
Mensaje citado por Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Native Win32 is planned for it (whether it makes it or not is another question, but it is the goal) ... Replication wasn't another BIG one? -- select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' AS email;

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-12 Thread Martin Marques
Mensaje citado por ow [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list) -Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin) -COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ] (Christopher) -Have psql \dn show only visible temp

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-12 Thread scott.marlowe
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Martin Marques wrote: Mensaje citado por Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Native Win32 is planned for it (whether it makes it or not is another question, but it is the goal) ... Replication wasn't another BIG one? Actually, I think it was PITR (Point in Time

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-12 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Martin Marques wrote: Mensaje citado por ow [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list) -Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin) -COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ]

Re: [HACKERS] What's planned for 7.5?

2004-01-12 Thread Christopher Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Marques) writes: Mensaje citado por Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Native Win32 is planned for it (whether it makes it or not is another question, but it is the goal) ... Replication wasn't another BIG one? Well, there are two replication things going on: 1.