Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
-COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ]
(Christopher)
Hey Bruce,
You probably should add 'Dump LOB comments in custom dump format' to the
todo. That's the last part of that task above which I haven't done yet,
and
-COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ]
(Christopher)
Hey Bruce,
You probably should add 'Dump LOB comments in custom dump format' to the
todo. That's the last part of that task above which I haven't done yet,
and for various reasons probably won't have
ow wrote:
Hi,
Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list)
-Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin)
-COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ]
(Christopher)
-Have psql \dn show only visible temp schemas using current_schemas()
Tom Lane wrote:
ow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list)
If you think the TODO list has *anything* to do with release planning,
you fundamentally misunderstand the way things are done around here.
The TODO list is a list of things that
Christopher Browne wrote:
2. Jan Wieck's work on SLONY-1
Many are keen to see the code, but it's not out yet. And it is
not self-evident that it will necessarily be ready to release in
conjunction with 7.5 (Not to say it _can't_ happen, but just that
we'll see the code
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:12:28AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
and cons, none is the one size that fits all magic solution. To select
Does anyone realy believe that there can be a one size fits all
solution? Heck, even Oracle and IBM offer a couple of different
systems, depending on what you need.
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:12:28AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
and cons, none is the one size that fits all magic solution. To select
Does anyone realy believe that there can be a one size fits all
solution? Heck, even Oracle and IBM offer a couple of different
systems,
Any chance we'll see the VACUUM delay patch (throttle) get into 7.5? I only
had the chance to try the first patch by Tom Lane and it was very good
already. I was hoping it gets into 7.4.1 but it didn't. :-(
I really need the VACUUM delay patch because my servers are begging to die
every time
Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any chance we'll see the VACUUM delay patch (throttle) get into 7.5?
The hope, in 7.5, is to have ARC, which is the super-duper-duper
version, working.
Actually, I'm not sure that ARC should be
Christopher Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any chance we'll see the VACUUM delay patch (throttle) get into 7.5?
The hope, in 7.5, is to have ARC, which is the super-duper-duper
version, working.
Actually, I'm not sure that ARC should be considered to
Hi,
Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list)
-Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin)
-COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ]
(Christopher)
-Have psql \dn show only visible temp schemas using current_schemas()
-Have psql '\i
Native Win32 is planned for it (whether it makes it or not is another
question, but it is the goal) ...
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, ow wrote:
Hi,
Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list)
-Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin)
-COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION |
Mensaje citado por Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Native Win32 is planned for it (whether it makes it or not is another
question, but it is the goal) ...
Replication wasn't another BIG one?
--
select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' AS email;
Mensaje citado por ow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list)
-Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin)
-COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ]
(Christopher)
-Have psql \dn show only visible temp
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Martin Marques wrote:
Mensaje citado por Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Native Win32 is planned for it (whether it makes it or not is another
question, but it is the goal) ...
Replication wasn't another BIG one?
Actually, I think it was PITR (Point in Time
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Martin Marques wrote:
Mensaje citado por ow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list)
-Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin)
-COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Marques) writes:
Mensaje citado por Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Native Win32 is planned for it (whether it makes it or not is another
question, but it is the goal) ...
Replication wasn't another BIG one?
Well, there are two replication things going on:
1.
17 matches
Mail list logo