Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > Revert. The XLogDir change was incomplete and basically useless to
> > > start with ...
> > Yea, but it was tied into the PGXLOG commit. Thomas, what are we doing
> > with that?
>
> Why ask me?
Sorry, I mean XLOGDIR. Somehow I kept saying PGXLOG. Anyway, it is al
> > Revert. The XLogDir change was incomplete and basically useless to
> > start with ...
> Yea, but it was tied into the PGXLOG commit. Thomas, what are we doing
> with that?
Why ask me?
- Thomas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > A recent change made XLogDir dynamically sized. There was a question of
> > whether this was a good idea since there are lots of other places that
> > use MAXPGPATH.
>
> > I have now found that pg_resetxlog doesn't compile anymore b
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A recent change made XLogDir dynamically sized. There was a question of
> whether this was a good idea since there are lots of other places that
> use MAXPGPATH.
> I have now found that pg_resetxlog doesn't compile anymore because
> XLogDir is a char*
A recent change made XLogDir dynamically sized. There was a question of
whether this was a good idea since there are lots of other places that
use MAXPGPATH.
I have now found that pg_resetxlog doesn't compile anymore because
XLogDir is a char* now instead of a char[].
Should I fix pg_resetxlog
