Peter Eisentraut writes:
> Yeah, I have resorted to putting something like
> export PGHOST=/tmp
> in all my test scripts, because the above-mentioned issues have affected
> Debian for a long time. Welcome to the party. ;-)
Yeah, my current patch for Fedora does exactly that in pg_regress, and
ha
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 01:44:59PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/3/12 5:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I went back for another try at building the Fedora packages with 9.2
> > branch tip ... and it still failed at pg_upgrade's "make check".
> > The reason for this is that test.sh starts a coupl
On 9/3/12 5:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I went back for another try at building the Fedora packages with 9.2
> branch tip ... and it still failed at pg_upgrade's "make check".
> The reason for this is that test.sh starts a couple of random
> postmasters, and those postmasters expect to put their socke
I went back for another try at building the Fedora packages with 9.2
branch tip ... and it still failed at pg_upgrade's "make check".
The reason for this is that test.sh starts a couple of random
postmasters, and those postmasters expect to put their sockets in
the configured default location (whic
