Hi,
On 2015-02-17 15:41:45 +0200, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
Attached an updated patch rebased on today's git master that never
defines aligned or packed empty.
This is also included in the current commitfest,
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/4/115/
I pushed a slightly modified (mostly moved
23.02.2015, 04:31, Robert Haas kirjoitti:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Oskari Saarenmaa o...@ohmu.fi wrote:
15.01.2015, 21:58, Robert Haas kirjoitti:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I think I'd for now simply not define pg_attribute_aligned()
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Oskari Saarenmaa o...@ohmu.fi wrote:
15.01.2015, 21:58, Robert Haas kirjoitti:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I think I'd for now simply not define pg_attribute_aligned() on
platforms where it's not supported,
17.02.2015, 15:46, Andres Freund kirjoitti:
On 2015-02-17 15:41:45 +0200, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
15.01.2015, 21:58, Robert Haas kirjoitti:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I think I'd for now simply not define pg_attribute_aligned() on
platforms
On 2015-02-17 15:41:45 +0200, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
15.01.2015, 21:58, Robert Haas kirjoitti:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I think I'd for now simply not define pg_attribute_aligned() on
platforms where it's not supported, instead of
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think I'd for now simply not define pg_attribute_aligned() on
platforms where it's not supported, instead of defining it empty. If we
need a softer variant we can name it pg_attribute_aligned_if_possible or
On 2015-01-14 17:46:39 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think it's better than the alternatives:
a) Don't support 64bit atomics on any 32bit platform. I think that'd be
sad because there's some places that could
On 2015-01-14 15:48:47 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Oskari Saarenmaa o...@ohmu.fi wrote:
Commit db4ec2ffce35 added alignment attributes for 64-bit atomic
variables as required on 32-bit platforms using
__attribute__((aligned(8)). That works fine with GCC, and
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think it's better than the alternatives:
a) Don't support 64bit atomics on any 32bit platform. I think that'd be
sad because there's some places that could greatly benefit from being
able to
15.01.2015, 00:54, Andres Freund kirjoitti:
I think I'd for now simply not define pg_attribute_aligned() on
platforms where it's not supported, instead of defining it empty. If we
need a softer variant we can name it pg_attribute_aligned_if_possible or
something.
Good point, all attributes
10 matches
Mail list logo