ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
I found that autovacuum launcher does not launch any workers in HEAD.
The attached autovacuum-fix.patch could fix the problem. I changed
to use 'greater or equal' instead of 'greater' at the
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
I found that autovacuum launcher does not launch any workers in HEAD.
The attached autovacuum-fix.patch could fix the problem. I changed
to use 'greater or equal' instead of 'greater' at the decision of
next autovacuum
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
I wrote:
I found that autovacuum launcher does not launch any workers in HEAD.
The attached autovacuum-fix.patch could fix the problem. I changed
to use 'greater or equal' instead of 'greater' at the decision of
next autovacuum target.
I have committed a patch
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
I wrote:
I found that autovacuum launcher does not launch any workers in HEAD.
The attached autovacuum-fix.patch could fix the problem. I changed
to use 'greater or equal' instead of 'greater' at the decision of
next autovacuum target.
I developed a different fix,
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
I found that autovacuum launcher does not launch any workers in HEAD.
AFAICS, we track the time to be vaccumed of each database in the following way:
1. In rebuild_database_list(), we initialize avl_dbase-adl_next_worker
with (current_time + autovacuum_naptime / nDBs).
2. In
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
I found that autovacuum launcher does not launch any workers in HEAD.
AFAICS, we track the time to be vaccumed of each database in the following
way:
1. In rebuild_database_list(), we initialize avl_dbase-adl_next_worker
with (current_time + autovacuum_naptime
I wrote:
I found that autovacuum launcher does not launch any workers in HEAD.
The attached autovacuum-fix.patch could fix the problem. I changed
to use 'greater or equal' instead of 'greater' at the decision of
next autovacuum target.
The point was in the resolution of timer; There is a
