Hi,
Is it desirable for me to build Solaris 8 SPARC packages (Solaris .pkg
format) of beta5?
I have experience in doing this.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Database Administrator
... if anyone wants to take a quick gander at it while I wait to announce
its availability ... let me know if therea re any obvious problems iwht it
...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
... if anyone wants to take a quick gander at it while I wait to announce
its availability ... let me know if therea re any obvious problems iwht it
...
Quick note: it will be Sunday at the earliest before I can build RPM's
of beta5. If the package release is after
... if anyone wants to take a quick gander at it while I wait to announce
its availability ... let me know if therea re any obvious problems iwht it
...
I was wondering what open items are left? Are we ready to start the
release process with a docs freeze?
--
Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was wondering what open items are left? Are we ready to start the
release process with a docs freeze?
I need some feedback on my commitdelay proposal first. If we add a
runtime parameter to control that, it had better be documented.
I have a couple
Bruce Momjian writes:
I was wondering what open items are left? Are we ready to start the
release process with a docs freeze?
I still have the JDBC docs to finish and someone was going to send some
PL/pgSQL stuff, but I guess I'll have to remind him again. What exactly
is the goal
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was wondering what open items are left? Are we ready to start the
release process with a docs freeze?
I need some feedback on my commitdelay proposal first. If we add a
runtime parameter to control that, it had better be documented.
I think we
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we need to give up on the delay for 7.1.X. I don't see any
good/easy solutions.
I take it you think my idea is not even worth trying. Why not?
regards, tom lane
Bruce Momjian writes:
I was wondering what open items are left? Are we ready to start the
release process with a docs freeze?
I still have the JDBC docs to finish and someone was going to send some
PL/pgSQL stuff, but I guess I'll have to remind him again. What exactly
is the goal of a docs
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we need to give up on the delay for 7.1.X. I don't see any
good/easy solutions.
I take it you think my idea is not even worth trying. Why not?
You are suggesting looking at the "I have modified something" bit in
Proc, and using that to
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, the change would have to show that doing the delay when some other
backend has dirtied a buffer is _better_ than doing no delay.
Agreed. However, we have as yet no data that proves nonzero commit
delay is bad in the presence of multiple active
Hmm. A further refinement would be to add a waiting-for-client-input
bit to PROC, although if you have a fast-responding client, ignoring
such backends wouldn't necessarily be a good thing. Notice that the
pgbench transaction involves multiple client requests ...
Let's keep talking. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
