Re: [HACKERS] compiling 7.1-beta1

2001-01-19 Thread Martin A. Marques
El Jue 18 Ene 2001 15:15, Tom Lane escribió: > > > The other question is if I have to do something special (dump and > > restore) when upgrading from 7.1-beta1 to 7.1-final (or any of the other > > betas)? > > You will need an initdb to go from beta1 to beta3. Sorry about that; > we try to avoid

RE: [HACKERS] compiling 7.1-beta1

2001-01-18 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> Fixed in current sources. (I think there is still one unused-var > complaint left in the XLOG code; I've been waiting on Vadim to do > something about it, because it looks like there is code still to be > written there.) Just commented out for now. Vadim

Re: [HACKERS] compiling 7.1-beta1

2001-01-18 Thread Tom Lane
"Martin A. Marques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm compiling beta 1 of 7.1 and I have a par of questions. > analyze.c: In function `transformInsertStmt': > analyze.c:425: warning: unused variable `resnode' Fixed in current sources. (I think there is still one unused-var complaint left in th

[HACKERS] compiling 7.1-beta1

2001-01-18 Thread Martin A. Marques
I'm compiling beta 1 of 7.1 and I have a par of questions. First I see things like this in the compilation output: gcc -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-error -I/usr/local/ssl//include -I../../../src/include -c analyze.c -o analyze.o analyze.c: In function `transformIns