On 1/11/07, Nikolay Samokhvalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Duplicate versions of functions (e.g., there would be XMLPATH() as the
main XPath function for XML type, producing arrays of values of XML type in
general case -- non-standard, but generalized).
Sorry :-) I wanted to say I suppose tha
Duplicate versions of functions (e.g., there would be XMLPATH() as the main
XPath function for XML type, producing arrays of values of XML type in
general case -- non-standard, but generalized).
In addition to two SQL files for registration of module functions in
database, I would move XSLT funct
Assuming a working xml type, what do you think the future of the
contrib/xml2 module should be?
At the moment, I'd imagine that we add duplicate versions of most
functions, where appropriate, that use the xml type instead of the text
type. Perhaps we should supply two sets of SQL files, so tha
