Re: [HACKERS] ddl triggers

2005-06-01 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 11:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Barnali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support to ddl triggers. This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives. Could we keep track of NOT TODO items also? The

Re: [HACKERS] ddl triggers

2005-06-01 Thread Jaime Casanova
Could we keep track of NOT TODO items also? The question is where do you put this idea if you reject it? :-) And of course a link to the thread, or an explanation on why it was rejected. That way if someone can solve the reason for reject it maybe a new discussion can be made. -- regards,

[HACKERS] ddl triggers

2005-05-31 Thread Barnali
Hi I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support to ddl triggers. This may be useful for tracking and auditing purposes. I am planning on prototyping this. Would be interested to hear any comment. Thanks Barnali ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] ddl triggers

2005-05-31 Thread Tom Lane
Barnali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support to ddl triggers. This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives. regards, tom lane ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] ddl triggers

2005-05-31 Thread Josh Berkus
Tom, I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support to ddl triggers. This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives. Eh? I thought it was a TODO. --Josh -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] ddl triggers

2005-05-31 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes: I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support to ddl triggers. This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives. Eh? I thought it was a TODO. Or see the TODO list ... I was looking for some small evidence of

[HACKERS] DDL triggers [was Re: [GENERAL] database constraints]

2004-10-07 Thread David Fetter
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:47:55AM +0700, David Garamond wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: This brings up an interesting idea. What if it were possible to set some kind of rules on DDL at database creation time? For example, I'd like to be able to throw an error if somebody tries to name an

Re: [HACKERS] DDL triggers [was Re: [GENERAL] database constraints]

2004-10-07 Thread Tom Lane
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How big a project would it be to have generalized DDL triggers? Apart from resource allocation, what are some downsides of providing such a facility? BEFORE triggers on the system catalogs are Right Out. In principle we could support AFTER triggers,

Re: [HACKERS] DDL triggers [was Re: [GENERAL] database constraints]

2004-10-07 Thread Gavin Sherry
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, David Fetter wrote: On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:47:55AM +0700, David Garamond wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: This brings up an interesting idea. What if it were possible to set some kind of rules on DDL at database creation time? For example, I'd like to be able to