On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> So isn't this still pretty broken? I notice that the clean and
> distclean targets still use addprefix on a lot of temporary/intermediate
> files that I would think get made in the build directory, not the source
> directory.
Yeah, those rules
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > By Peter's recent decree that tarballs are supposed to be built in
> > non-vpath-builds only, I am not really sure what should actually happen
> > here, both on build and on the various clean targets.
>
> I think that
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> By Peter's recent decree that tarballs are supposed to be built in
> non-vpath-builds only, I am not really sure what should actually happen
> here, both on build and on the various clean targets.
I think that that means the Makefile can just assume that *every* built
fil
Tom Lane wrote:
> So isn't this still pretty broken? I notice that the clean and
> distclean targets still use addprefix on a lot of temporary/intermediate
> files that I would think get made in the build directory, not the source
> directory.
Yeah, I noticed that too. I'm not too sure about it,
So isn't this still pretty broken? I notice that the clean and
distclean targets still use addprefix on a lot of temporary/intermediate
files that I would think get made in the build directory, not the source
directory. The references to man files in srcdir in
nonsql_manpage_files and adjacent ma
