Re: [HACKERS] ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)

2003-10-07 Thread Patrick Welche
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 03:00:36PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:59:19PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: Today's cvs doesn't compile. I think it is due to cvs diff -r1.7 -r1.8

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)

2003-10-03 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: Today's cvs doesn't compile. I think it is due to cvs diff -r1.7 -r1.8 src/interfaces/ecpg/include/datetime.h I have dtime_t defined in my sys/types.h. The old version of datetime.h used I tried too hide these type definitions

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)

2003-10-03 Thread Patrick Welche
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:59:19PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: Today's cvs doesn't compile. I think it is due to cvs diff -r1.7 -r1.8 src/interfaces/ecpg/include/datetime.h I have dtime_t defined in my sys/types.h. The old

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)

2003-09-30 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 08:08:01PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: Today's cvs doesn't compile. I think it is due to Forgot one question. WHich platform do you use? NetBSD - to quote cvs blame: 1.42 (eeh 30-Dec-99): typedef

[HACKERS] ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)

2003-09-29 Thread Patrick Welche
Today's cvs doesn't compile. I think it is due to cvs diff -r1.7 -r1.8 src/interfaces/ecpg/include/datetime.h I have dtime_t defined in my sys/types.h. The old version of datetime.h used #define dtime_t timestamp, the new one uses a typedef. Is there actually a reason to keep dtime_t, or would

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)

2003-09-29 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: Today's cvs doesn't compile. I think it is due to Forgot one question. WHich platform do you use? Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)

2003-09-29 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: Today's cvs doesn't compile. I think it is due to cvs diff -r1.7 -r1.8 src/interfaces/ecpg/include/datetime.h I have dtime_t defined in my sys/types.h. The old version of datetime.h used Argh, didn't know that some systems have

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)

2003-09-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Michael Meskes wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: Today's cvs doesn't compile. I think it is due to cvs diff -r1.7 -r1.8 src/interfaces/ecpg/include/datetime.h I have dtime_t defined in my sys/types.h. The old version of datetime.h used For ecpg it does

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)

2003-09-29 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 02:11:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: Should that be visible to non-Informix-compatible builds, or is there no way to control that. No, it is just defined if you include datetime.h which is supposed to replace Informix file. And the datetime type is only used inside