Re: [HACKERS] email built in type

2004-05-10 Thread Neil Conway
On Sat, 2004-05-08 at 13:10, Gaetano Mendola wrote: However an *add on* is an *add on* with not the same eligibility of the main project I'd suggest implementing the custom datatype first and packaging it separately (say, via pgFoundry) -- it can always be moved into the core distribution at

Re: [HACKERS] email built in type

2004-05-10 Thread Gaetano Mendola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Conway wrote: | On Sat, 2004-05-08 at 13:10, Gaetano Mendola wrote: | |However an *add on* is an *add on* with not the same eligibility |of the main project | | | I'd suggest implementing the custom datatype first and packaging it | separately

[HACKERS] email built in type

2004-05-08 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Hi all, about you is it ok for you if I write the email built in type ? I know of course that I can do it with a DOMAIN. Regards Gaetano Mendola ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

Re: [HACKERS] email built in type

2004-05-08 Thread Tom Lane
Gaetano Mendola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: about you is it ok for you if I write the email built in type ? You're going to have to explain why it has to be a built-in type. Can't you do what you want as a local add-on? Is it likely that the functionality you have in mind would be exactly what

Re: [HACKERS] email built in type

2004-05-08 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Tom Lane wrote: Gaetano Mendola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: about you is it ok for you if I write the email built in type ? You're going to have to explain why it has to be a built-in type. Can't you do what you want as a local add-on? Is it likely that the functionality you have in mind would

Re: [HACKERS] email built in type

2004-05-08 Thread Tom Lane
Gaetano Mendola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Can't you do what you want as a local add-on? I guess that for manage efficiently million of email addresses I need to have a built in type instead of a domain with a regex as validator, You probably ought to do some measurements

Re: [HACKERS] email built in type

2004-05-08 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Tom Lane wrote: Gaetano Mendola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Can't you do what you want as a local add-on? I guess that for manage efficiently million of email addresses I need to have a built in type instead of a domain with a regex as validator, You probably ought to do some

Re: [HACKERS] email built in type

2004-05-08 Thread Bernd Helmle
--On Samstag, Mai 08, 2004 14:14:10 +0200 Gaetano Mendola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, about you is it ok for you if I write the email built in type ? I know of course that I can do it with a DOMAIN. Regards Gaetano Mendola Funny, I had the idea some time ago, too. The problem was that I