Re: [HACKERS] estimated_count() implementation

2006-10-22 Thread Volkan YAZICI
On Oct 21 05:09, Michael Fuhr wrote: I hadn't noticed the TODO item but about a year ago I posted a cursor_plan_rows() function and asked for comments. Ah! I didn't see this. The only reply was from Tom, who said, Given how far off it frequently is, I can't believe that any of the people who

Re: [HACKERS] estimated_count() implementation

2006-10-22 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 12:07 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: On Oct 21 05:09, Michael Fuhr wrote: I hadn't noticed the TODO item but about a year ago I posted a cursor_plan_rows() function and asked for comments. Ah! I didn't see this. The only reply was from Tom, who said, Given how far

Re: [HACKERS] estimated_count() implementation

2006-10-22 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 12:07 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: But OTOH, Tom's complaints look like still applicable for my estimated_count() too. Does this TODO need a little bit more clarification or we can count is a redundant one?

[HACKERS] estimated_count() implementation

2006-10-21 Thread Volkan YAZICI
Hi, I'm trying to implement estimated_count() function that's mentioned in the TODO list. First of all, I wanted to learn if this TODO item is still valid? I looked at the related -hackers discussions, does anybody want to say more sth related with the implementation? Also I've some questions.

Re: [HACKERS] estimated_count() implementation

2006-10-21 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 11:44:19PM +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote: I'm trying to implement estimated_count() function that's mentioned in the TODO list. First of all, I wanted to learn if this TODO item is still valid? I looked at the related -hackers discussions, does anybody want to say more sth