That's strange. I didn't see it. Can you send it over. The archives
don't seem to be working again.
>
> I believe that I sent a patch on Sep 17 for this to -patches although
> I don't know if anyone saw it (it's in the archives, so I know it
> went through).
>
> Stephan Szabo
> [EMAIL PROTEC
I believe that I sent a patch on Sep 17 for this to -patches although
I don't know if anyone saw it (it's in the archives, so I know it
went through).
Stephan Szabo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Has this been resolved?
>
> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Tatsuo Ishii wro
Has this been resolved?
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> > It seems that foreign key does not work in current, if specified with
> > primary key definition. Take a look at following example(works in
> > 7.0.2.):
> >
> > test=# CREATE TABLE PKTABLE ( ptest1 int, ptest2 int, pte
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> It seems that foreign key does not work in current, if specified with
> primary key definition. Take a look at following example(works in
> 7.0.2.):
>
> test=# CREATE TABLE PKTABLE ( ptest1 int, ptest2 int, ptest3 int, ptest4 text,
>PRIMARY KEY(ptest1
It seems that foreign key does not work in current, if specified with
primary key definition. Take a look at following example(works in
7.0.2.):
test=# CREATE TABLE PKTABLE ( ptest1 int, ptest2 int, ptest3 int, ptest4 text, PRIMARY
KEY(ptest1, ptest2, ptest3) );
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY
