Maybe I'm losing it, but I forced to apologize for trying to push for
open_sync as the default.
I have spent the last few days trying to come to some solid, documented
and verifyable, conclusions about which is the best fsync method. At a
minimum, what is the best fsync method for Linux. I can't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What would be a good strategy for addressing this issue? Is it an issue at
all? Is it simply a documentation issue? Do we craft some sort of test
that can characterize the behavior? What would that test need to do?
It seems to me that it's a documentation issue.
Tom Lane wrote:
Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I don't think any test that we could build would be as useful as simply
trying the different settings with an installation's real workload.
Benchmarking the real workload isn't always so easy, and might be quite
time
Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I don't think any test that we could build would be as useful as simply
trying the different settings with an installation's real workload.
Benchmarking the real workload isn't always so easy, and might be quite
time consuming to
Tom Lane wrote:
I don't think any test that we could build would be as useful as simply
trying the different settings with an installation's real workload.
Benchmarking the real workload isn't always so easy, and might be quite
time consuming to obtain meaningful values. Don't you think that some
