On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:03:39PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Patches committed, please re-enable the back branches so we can
see what happens.
I have tested this back as far as 8.0, and all seems OK.
7.4 passed too.
Kurt
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:59:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did try the patch. It fails just the same way.
Hmph. So we still don't know why 8.2 and 8.3 behave differently ...
[ pokes around ... ] Hah, maybe this is it:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:59:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-03/msg00292.php
This patch atleast solves the problems with 8.2.
Excellent, I'll go back-patch that and we can see what else there is.
You still
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:11:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:59:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-03/msg00292.php
This patch atleast solves the problems with 8.2.
Excellent,
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:11:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Excellent, I'll go back-patch that and we can see what else there is.
You still have panda set up to build with gcc 4.3, correct?
Yes, I just disabled some cron jobs for those that failed.
Patches
Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:11:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Excellent, I'll go back-patch that and we can see what else there is.
You still have panda set up to build with gcc 4.3, correct?
Yes, I just disabled some
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:53:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did some tests with gcc 4.3 on the branches from 7.4 to 8.3 and head.
8.3 and head don't have a problem. All others failed in the
ContribCheck state.
You can see the results on buildfarm
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:53:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did some tests with gcc 4.3 on the branches from 7.4 to 8.3 and head.
8.3 and head don't have a problem. All others failed in the
ContribCheck state.
Bizarre.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:05:14PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:53:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did some tests with gcc 4.3 on the branches from 7.4 to 8.3 and head.
8.3 and head don't have a
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
No, this has nothing to do with CFLAGS. It's calling a function which
returns something other than it actually returns.
Yeah but apparently gcc 4.3 is working in 8.3 and later. What happens
to your sample program if you compile it with the CFLAGS used in 8.3
versus those
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
No, this has nothing to do with CFLAGS. It's calling a function which
returns something other than it actually returns.
Yeah but apparently gcc 4.3 is working in 8.3 and later. What happens
to your sample program if you compile it with the
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 03:05:31PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
No, this has nothing to do with CFLAGS. It's calling a function which
returns something other than it actually returns.
Yeah but apparently gcc 4.3 is working in 8.3 and later. What happens
to your
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
8.2 and 8.3 actually get the same value in fmgr_oldstyle(), it just
seems they do something else with it somewhere else.
Doh. I'll bet the difference is this fix:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-07/msg00131.php
Please try that patch
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:52:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
8.2 and 8.3 actually get the same value in fmgr_oldstyle(), it just
seems they do something else with it somewhere else.
Doh. I'll bet the difference is this fix:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:52:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Please try that patch and see what it fixes pre-8.3.
No, returnValue contains the same value for both 8.2 and 8.3. There is
no reason why casting from a char * to a char * should result into
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 03:52:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:52:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Please try that patch and see what it fixes pre-8.3.
No, returnValue contains the same value for both 8.2 and 8.3. There is
no
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did try the patch. It fails just the same way.
Hmph. So we still don't know why 8.2 and 8.3 behave differently ...
[ pokes around ... ] Hah, maybe this is it:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-03/msg00292.php
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:59:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did try the patch. It fails just the same way.
Hmph. So we still don't know why 8.2 and 8.3 behave differently ...
[ pokes around ... ] Hah, maybe this is it:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:53:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did some tests with gcc 4.3 on the branches from 7.4 to 8.3 and head.
8.3 and head don't have a problem. All others failed in the
ContribCheck state.
You can see the results on buildfarm
Hi,
I did some tests with gcc 4.3 on the branches from 7.4 to 8.3 and head.
8.3 and head don't have a problem. All others failed in the
ContribCheck state.
You can see the results on buildfarm member panda.
Kurt
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did some tests with gcc 4.3 on the branches from 7.4 to 8.3 and head.
8.3 and head don't have a problem. All others failed in the
ContribCheck state.
You can see the results on buildfarm member panda.
Bizarre. There doesn't seem to be any significant
21 matches
Mail list logo
