Re: [HACKERS] gen_random_uuid security not explicit in documentation

On 30 June 2017 06:45:04 EEST, Noah Misch wrote: >This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. >Kindly send >a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent >status >update. I'll fix this some time next week. (I'm on vacation

Re: [HACKERS] gen_random_uuid security not explicit in documentation

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:26:28PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:23:36AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > > I'm inclined to change gen_random_uuid() to throw an error if the server > > > is >

Re: [HACKERS] gen_random_uuid security not explicit in documentation

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:23:36AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > I'm inclined to change gen_random_uuid() to throw an error if the server is > > built with --disable-strong-random, like gen_random_bytes() does. That