On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 18:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Nathan Boley npbo...@gmail.com writes:
I don't think this is a bug.
hmmm... Well, I assumed it was a bug from a comment in analyze.
From ( near ) line 2130 in analyze.c
* least 2 instances in the sample. Also, we won't suppress
Surely the most important point in the OP was that ineqsel does not
correctly binary search in the presence of duplicates.
It would have been if I were correct :-( .
Looking at it again, that was from a bug in my code. Thanks for your
time, and sorry about the noise.
-Nathan
--
Sent via
Nathan Boley npbo...@gmail.com writes:
For heavy tailed distributions, it is possible for analyze to
duplicate histogram boundaries.
I don't think this is a bug. You've got values that didn't make it into
the MCV list, but nonetheless occupy multiple buckets' worth of space in
the remainder of
For heavy tailed distributions, it is possible for analyze to
duplicate histogram boundaries.
I don't think this is a bug.
hmmm... Well, I assumed it was a bug from a comment in analyze.
From ( near ) line 2130 in analyze.c
* least 2 instances in the sample. Also, we won't suppress values
Nathan Boley npbo...@gmail.com writes:
I don't think this is a bug.
hmmm... Well, I assumed it was a bug from a comment in analyze.
From ( near ) line 2130 in analyze.c
* least 2 instances in the sample. Also, we won't suppress values
* that have a frequency of at least 1/K where K is
