On tis, 2011-05-24 at 15:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I would argue that -Z ought to turn on gzip without my having to
write
-z as well (at least when the argument is greater than zero; possibly
-Z0 should be allowed as meaning no compression).
My concern with that is that if we ever add
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tis, 2011-05-24 at 15:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I would argue that -Z ought to turn on gzip without my having to write
-z as well (at least when the argument is greater than zero; possibly
-Z0 should be allowed as meaning no compression).
My
On tor, 2011-05-26 at 16:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
But if you want to take such an extension into account right now,
maybe we ought to design that feature now. What are you seeing it as
looking like?
My thought is that -z should just mean give me compression; a good
default compression
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tor, 2011-05-26 at 16:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
But if you want to take such an extension into account right now,
maybe we ought to design that feature now. What are you seeing it as
looking like?
My thought is that -z should just mean give me
On sön, 2011-05-22 at 16:43 -0400, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 17:45, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On fre, 2011-05-20 at 14:19 -0400, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I suggest we add an argument-less option -z that means compress,
and
then -Z can be relegated to
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Quick patch for verification. I chose the naming -z/--gzip to mirror
GNU tar.
I would argue that -Z ought to turn on gzip without my having to write
-z as well (at least when the argument is greater than zero; possibly
-Z0 should be allowed as meaning
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 17:45, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On fre, 2011-05-20 at 14:19 -0400, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I suggest we add an argument-less option -z that means compress,
and
then -Z can be relegated to choosing the compression level.
We can't just use -Z without a
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 17:56, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
There is no way to tell pg_basebackup to just compress the thing in a
default way. You have to pick some number and then write -Z8 or
something. I suppose that interface was copied from pg_dump, but there
it's not that
On fre, 2011-05-20 at 14:19 -0400, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I suggest we add an argument-less option -z that means compress,
and
then -Z can be relegated to choosing the compression level.
We can't just use -Z without a parameter for that?
You can't portably have a command-line option with
There is no way to tell pg_basebackup to just compress the thing in a
default way. You have to pick some number and then write -Z8 or
something. I suppose that interface was copied from pg_dump, but there
it's not that commonly used because the right formats are compressed by
default.
I suggest
10 matches
Mail list logo
