[HACKERS] Jaguar is up

2007-11-29 Thread ohp
Hmm, isn't 4h22m a LONG time for it even with clobbered cache? All my tests so far have last less than 2h.. Regards -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) 15, Chemin des Monges+33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64

Re: [HACKERS] Jaguar is up

2007-11-29 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hmm, isn't 4h22m a LONG time for it even with clobbered cache? All my tests so far have last less than 2h.. I'm sure that yesterday' LookupOpclassInfo change would have made it even more mind-bogglingly slow than before... regards, tom lane

[HACKERS] jaguar is up

2007-11-28 Thread ohp
Jaguar is a new animal meant to test specific defines as asked by Tom sometime ago. Right now, it compiles and runs with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS Let me know if you want me to add/change flags Best regards -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) 15, Chemin des Monges

Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is up

2007-11-28 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jaguar is a new animal meant to test specific defines as asked by Tom sometime ago. Right now, it compiles and runs with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS Cool, how long does it take to run the regression tests? Let me know if you want me to add/change flags Awhile back I

Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is up

2007-11-28 Thread ohp
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote: Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:45:30 -0500 From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is up [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jaguar is a new animal meant to test

Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is up

2007-11-28 Thread Gregory Stark
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I didn't do anything about it at the time, but now I am tempted to modify LookupOpclassInfo() so that CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS disables its internal cache. Any objections? That sounds not equivalent to receiving a relcache flush at any particular point in time

Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is up

2007-11-28 Thread Tom Lane
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I didn't do anything about it at the time, but now I am tempted to modify LookupOpclassInfo() so that CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS disables its internal cache. Any objections? That sounds not equivalent to receiving a