On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-04-02 23:50:19 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
I just tried it on clang. It builds clean with -Wc11-extensions except
warning about _Static_assert(). That's possibly fixable with some
autoconf trickery.
On 2014-04-02 23:50:19 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
I just tried it on clang. It builds clean with -Wc11-extensions except
warning about _Static_assert(). That's possibly fixable with some
autoconf trickery.
Ah. That sounds promising. What clang version is that?
It's debian's
Same issue as in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/31718.1394059...@sss.pgh.pa.us
In file included from jsonb.c:19:
../../../../src/include/utils/jsonb.h:195: warning: unnamed struct/union that
defines no instances
jsonb.c: In function `jsonb_in_object_field_start':
jsonb.c:250: structure has
Tom Lane wrote:
Same issue as in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/31718.1394059...@sss.pgh.pa.us
In file included from jsonb.c:19:
../../../../src/include/utils/jsonb.h:195: warning: unnamed struct/union that
defines no instances
jsonb.c: In function `jsonb_in_object_field_start':
On 2014-04-02 13:56:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
We really need to get a buildfarm member going that complains about this.
I had hoped to install a sufficiently old gcc version on prairiedog or
dromedary, but didn't have much luck rebuilding ancient gcc releases on
OS X.
Some experimentation
On 2014-04-02 15:17:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Same issue as in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/31718.1394059...@sss.pgh.pa.us
In file included from jsonb.c:19:
../../../../src/include/utils/jsonb.h:195: warning: unnamed struct/union
that defines no
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-04-02 15:17:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
We really need to get a buildfarm member going that complains about this.
Complain how? I find that gcc -std=c90 -pedantic emits these warnings about
it:
def.c:3:24: warning:
On 2014-04-02 14:36:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-04-02 15:17:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
We really need to get a buildfarm member going that complains about this.
Complain how? I find that gcc -std=c90 -pedantic
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-04-02 13:56:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
We really need to get a buildfarm member going that complains about this.
I had hoped to install a sufficiently old gcc version on prairiedog or
dromedary, but didn't have much luck rebuilding ancient
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-04-02 14:36:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Well, in any case, people very seldom check to see if any buildfarm
members are producing compiler warnings. You need the build to actually
go red to get anyone's attention reliably.
Yea, we'd need to
On 2014-04-02 14:42:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-04-02 13:56:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
We really need to get a buildfarm member going that complains about this.
I had hoped to install a sufficiently old gcc version on prairiedog or
On 2014-04-02 15:03:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-04-02 14:36:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Well, in any case, people very seldom check to see if any buildfarm
members are producing compiler warnings. You need the build to actually
go red to
12 matches
Mail list logo
