On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
(1) can you re-link me to the pgbench and sysbench setup you used to
test this originally? I'd like to implement those.
I didn't use sysbench. The pgbench command I used was something like:
pgbench -n -S -T $TIME -c
Robert,
I should be able to do some performance testing on this, but not today.
Questions:
(1) can you re-link me to the pgbench and sysbench setup you used to
test this originally? I'd like to implement those.
(2) the max machine I can test these on is 16 cores. Is that adequate,
or do we
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 13:15 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is an updated version of the lazy vxid locks patch [1], which
applies over the latest reduce the overhead of frequent table
locks[2] patch.
[1]
Here is an updated version of the lazy vxid locks patch [1], which
applies over the latest reduce the overhead of frequent table
locks[2] patch.
[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=585
[2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=572
--
Robert Haas
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is an updated version of the lazy vxid locks patch [1], which
applies over the latest reduce the overhead of frequent table
locks[2] patch.
[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=585
[2]
