Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am also attaching a few more of Leslie's changes that I think are
> > useful. ?The first clarifies a confusion Leslie had about the fact that
> > "return" is referencing the return value of the function and not the
>
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am also attaching a few more of Leslie's changes that I think are
> useful. The first clarifies a confusion Leslie had about the fact that
> "return" is referencing the return value of the function and not the
> value returned in the point
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> OK, that last part seems kind of vague. ?;-) ?Can you hack up the diff
> >> to have just the changes you think are worthwhile? ?You can just remove
> >> the parts of the diff you don't like.
> >
> > Robert, here is a u
On ons, 2011-01-12 at 12:04 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
> >
> > Leslie found a number of places o
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> OK, that last part seems kind of vague. ;-) Can you hack up the diff
>> to have just the changes you think are worthwhile? You can just remove
>> the parts of the diff you don't like.
>
> Robert, here is a unified diff, which I think it e
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> > > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
> > >
> > > Leslie found a number of places our
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
> >
> > Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that were un
2011/1/12 Robert Haas
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
> >
> > Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that we
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
>
> Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that were unclear
> or awkward, and this
The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that were unclear
or awkward, and this diff generated by me attempts to address them.
I have already up
10 matches
Mail list logo
