On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
However, I'm a bit afraid that it will confuse DBA if we use
restored under the pg_xlog replay context, because we have
already used restored that
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
However, I'm a bit afraid that it will confuse DBA if we use
restored
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
2012/01/13 0:13, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Simon Riggssi...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Simon Riggssi...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
Anyway, how about this one?
If we have 47 in archive, and 48 in pg_xlog,
(1) LOG: restored log file 00080047 from archive
(2) LOG: replaying log file 00080047
(3) LOG: could not restore
2012/1/11 Euler Taveira de Oliveira eu...@timbira.com:
On 08-01-2012 11:59, Satoshi Nagayasu / Uptime Technologies, LLC. wrote:
[2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758: LOG: restored log file
00080046 from archive
[2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758: LOG: recoverying
2012/01/11 19:56, Simon Riggs wrote:
2012/1/11 Euler Taveira de Oliveiraeu...@timbira.com:
On 08-01-2012 11:59, Satoshi Nagayasu / Uptime Technologies, LLC. wrote:
[2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758: LOG: restored log file
00080046 from archive
[2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
However, I'm a bit afraid that it will confuse DBA if we use
restored under the pg_xlog replay context, because we have
already used restored that means a WAL file as successfully
copied (not replayed) from archive
On 08-01-2012 11:59, Satoshi Nagayasu / Uptime Technologies, LLC. wrote:
[2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758: LOG: restored log file
00080046 from archive
[2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758: LOG: recoverying 00080046
[2011-12-08 15:14:36 JST] 16758: LOG: restored
Hi,
When I look into archive recovery deeply as DBA point of view, I found
that it's difficult to know (1) when the recovery process switched
reading WAL segments files from archive directory to pg_xlog directory,
and (2) whether it succeeded applying the latest WAL segments in the
pg_xlog
10 matches
Mail list logo
