Tom Lane said:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines
>> with info via a printf-style string.
>
>> Any comments or suggestions before I start?
>
> I think Bruce already applied the previous version of your patch.
Not that
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
> info via a printf-style string.
> Any comments or suggestions before I start?
I think Bruce already applied the previous version of your patch. No
problem with yanking it out f
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines
with info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
> > info via a printf-style string.
> >
> > Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
> > implement the following escapes:
> >
> > %U = user
>
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P = pid
%L = session log line
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P = pid
%L = session log line number
%C = sessionid
