On 2013-11-12 19:24:39 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-11-12 13:18:19 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Completely agreed. As evidenced by the fact that the current change
doesn't update all relevant comments
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
[ updated patch-set ]
I'm pretty happy with what's now patch #1, f/k/a known as patch #3,
and probably somewhere else in the set before that. At any rate, I
refer to
Hi,
On 2013-11-12 12:13:54 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
[ updated patch-set ]
I'm pretty happy with what's now patch #1, f/k/a known as patch #3,
and probably somewhere else in the set before that. At any rate, I
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Completely agreed. As evidenced by the fact that the current change
doesn't update all relevant comments code. I wonder if we shouldn't
leave the function the current way and just add a new function for the
new
On 2013-11-12 13:18:19 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Completely agreed. As evidenced by the fact that the current change
doesn't update all relevant comments code. I wonder if we shouldn't
leave the function the
