On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 07:41:15AM -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Since there seems to be interest in discussing incremental
> maintenance of materialized views *now*, I'm starting this thread
> to try to avoid polluting unrelated threads with the discussion. I
> don't intend to spend a lot of tim
On 17 June 2013 15:41, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> While I have yet to look in detail at the mechanism for capturing
> the initial delta on the base tables, the two fairly obvious
> candidates are to stuff the before and after images into a
> tuplestore or temp table as base table changes are written
On 17 June 2013 15:41, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Since there seems to be interest in discussing incremental
> maintenance of materialized views *now*
Since your earlier complaint, I specificaly said I was happy to wait
to discuss that. Why have you raised this now?
--
Simon Riggs
On 2013-06-17 16:41 +02:00, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Since there seems to be interest in discussing incremental
maintenance of materialized views *now*, I'm starting this thread
to try to avoid polluting unrelated threads with the discussion. I
don't intend to spend a lot of time on it until the CF
Since there seems to be interest in discussing incremental
maintenance of materialized views *now*, I'm starting this thread
to try to avoid polluting unrelated threads with the discussion. I
don't intend to spend a lot of time on it until the CF in progress
completes, but at that point the work w
