Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You would think that would catch it. My problem is that I am compiling
> > with -O0, because I compile all day and I don't care about optimization.
>
> You should reconsider that. At -O0 gcc doesn't do any flow analysis,
> and thus
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You would think that would catch it. My problem is that I am compiling
> with -O0, because I compile all day and I don't care about optimization.
You should reconsider that. At -O0 gcc doesn't do any flow analysis,
and thus you lose many important warn
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:16:30PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I use:
>
> -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align
Some other useful ones are -pedantic -W -Wfloat-equal -Wshadow
-Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wconversion -Wsign-compare -Wsign-promo.
>
Dann Corbit wrote:
> Instead of just assigning a value, it means it is conceivable that a
> path allows undefined behavior. Example:
>
> ...
> int y;
> if (x < 5)
>y = 3;
> if (x > 5)
>y = 1;
>
> What happens if x == 5? Then y is indeterminate.
> Sometimes, the flow analysis just g
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:58 PM
> To: Joe Conway
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more compile warnings
>
>
> Rod, can you comment on
Rod, can you comment on these warnings Joe Conway's compiler is showing?
I don't see the warnings with gcc, but clearly they look like problems.
I can just assign a NULL on definition, but I thought you should take a
look.
-
