> > I did some benchmarking with/without multibyte support using current.
> > (1) regression test
> > (2) pgbench
>
> pgbench unfortunately seems quite irrelevant to this issue, since it
> performs no textual operations whatsoever. It'd be interesting to
> modify pgbench so that it updates the "
> pgbench unfortunately seems quite irrelevant to this issue, since it
> performs no textual operations whatsoever.
Yup.
> It'd be interesting to
> modify pgbench so that it updates the "filler" column somehow on each
> update (perhaps store a text copy of the new balance there), and then
> rep
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did some benchmarking with/without multibyte support using current.
> (1) regression test
> (2) pgbench
pgbench unfortunately seems quite irrelevant to this issue, since it
performs no textual operations whatsoever. It'd be interesting to
modify pgben
> > With multibyte support(first column is the concurrent user, second is
> > the TPS):
> ...
> > 32 95.947363
> > 64 92.718780
> > 128 61.725883
> >
> > Witout multibyte support:
> ...
> > 32 92.283645
> > 64 86.936559
> > 128 87.584099
>
> Do you have any theory why multibyte passes non-mb at
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> I did some benchmarking with/without multibyte support using current.
...
> (2) pgbench
>
> With multibyte support(first column is the concurrent user, second is
> the TPS):
...
> 32 95.947363
> 64 92.718780
> 128 61.725883
>
> Witout multibyte support:
...
> 32 92.28
> It's nice.
:-)
> Can you try it for old 7.1? I should like see some improvement between
> release:-)
Not sure if it's meaningfull since new regression test cases might be
added for current?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if p
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 02:22:07PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> I did some benchmarking with/without multibyte support using current.
>
> (1) regression test
>
> With multibyte support:
> 9.52user 3.38system 0:59.27elapsed 21%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
>
> Without multibyte support:
I did some benchmarking with/without multibyte support using current.
(1) regression test
With multibyte support:
9.52user 3.38system 0:59.27elapsed 21%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
Without multibyte support:
8.97user 4.84system 1:00.85elapsed 22%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
