Re: [HACKERS] openbsd, plpython, missing threading symbols

2005-09-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Marko Kreen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:27:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Where are we going with this patch? It doesn't test specific OS's known > > to fail. > > I hoped people m

Re: [HACKERS] openbsd, plpython, missing threading symbols

2005-08-13 Thread Marko Kreen
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:27:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Where are we going with this patch? It doesn't test specific OS's known > to fail. I hoped people more familiar with the problem would tune it... Here is updated patch where I test specifically 'openbsd*|freebsd*' instead of '*bsd*

Re: [HACKERS] openbsd, plpython, missing threading symbols

2005-08-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Where are we going with this patch? It doesn't test specific OS's known to fail. --- Marko Kreen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:14:51PM +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > >Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] openbsd, plpython, missing threading symbols

2005-08-04 Thread Marko Kreen
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:14:51PM +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>Tom Lane wrote: > >>>The alternative is to say that plpython isn't supported on BSDen unless > >>>you choose to build an unthreaded libpython. > >>I'm OK with th

Re: [HACKERS] openbsd, plpython, missing threading symbols

2005-08-04 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>Tom Lane wrote: >> >>>The alternative is to say that plpython isn't supported on BSDen unless >>>you choose to build an unthreaded libpython. > > >>I'm OK with that, but if that's what's done I think we should check for >>it up fr

Re: [HACKERS] openbsd, plpython, missing threading symbols

2005-08-03 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> The alternative is to say that plpython isn't supported on BSDen unless >> you choose to build an unthreaded libpython. > I'm OK with that, but if that's what's done I think we should check for > it up front at configure time and not

Re: [HACKERS] openbsd, plpython, missing threading symbols

2005-08-03 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Did we recently make some fixes for FBSD that cured the problem with unresolved pthread* symbols for plpython? No, it's not fixed. I think the owner of the freebsd buildfarm machine masked the problem by building an unthrea

Re: [HACKERS] openbsd, plpython, missing threading symbols

2005-08-03 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did we recently make some fixes for FBSD that cured the problem with > unresolved pthread* symbols for plpython? No, it's not fixed. I think the owner of the freebsd buildfarm machine masked the problem by building an unthreaded libpython. The only f

[HACKERS] openbsd, plpython, missing threading symbols

2005-08-03 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Did we recently make some fixes for FBSD that cured the problem with unresolved pthread* symbols for plpython? If so, should we look at possibly doing something similar for OpenBSD? That might clean up buildfarm member spoonbill which has been failing ever since we started testing PLs. Stefan