On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:55:06PM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> I added the #include to the nan_test.pgc in the hope
> it fixes the Windows machines in the buildfarm.
I already commited this earlier today after looking at the problem myself. But
of course I'm also just hoping as I do not ha
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:59:57AM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Also, another oversight needs fixing on my part, for which
> the patch is atttached. The INSERT statement in nan_test.pgc
> contains platform dependent strings, "inf" instead of "infinity".
Committed.
Michael
--
Michael Meske
Michael Meskes írta:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
>> Here's the new patch with the updated regression test.
>>
>
> Committed. Thanks a lot.
>
> Michael
>
Tom Lane committed a fix for Windows, there was a missing
#include
in execute.c, but ther
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Here's the new patch with the updated regression test.
Committed. Thanks a lot.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|P
Michael Meskes írta:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:09:34AM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
>> After I sent it and reread my mail, I realized that my fix
>> wouldn't be enough because of the above: ECPG uses sprintf()
>> for float and double, and just like in the backend, a common
>> code to se
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:09:34AM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> After I sent it and reread my mail, I realized that my fix
> wouldn't be enough because of the above: ECPG uses sprintf()
> for float and double, and just like in the backend, a common
> code to send "NaN" and +/- "Infinity" to t
Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
> - different UNIX(-like) platforms write out different strings in printf()
> for a double variable storing. NaN. E.g.: Linux: "nan",
> Solaris: "NaN", AIX: "NaNQ"
>
After I sent it and reread my mail, I realized that my fix
wouldn't be enough because of the above:
Michael Meskes írta:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:32:20AM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
>> I know. Patches were already posted for that,
>> waiting for Michael to review and apply it.
>>
>
> Just came back from another trip. Patch works on my system, so I committed
> it.
>
> Michael
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:32:20AM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> I know. Patches were already posted for that,
> waiting for Michael to review and apply it.
Just came back from another trip. Patch works on my system, so I committed it.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
Andrew Dunstan írta:
>
> We seem to have a large portion of the buildfarm red from the ECPG
> tests, presumably due to the recently applied out-of-scope cursor
> patches.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
Hi.
I know. Patches were already posted for that,
waiting for Michael to review and apply it.
Look at th
We seem to have a large portion of the buildfarm red from the ECPG
tests, presumably due to the recently applied out-of-scope cursor patches.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
