Applied by Alvaro. Thanks.
---
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Greetings,
I've got a patch to be reviewed for having the stats system keep
track of the last
time a table was vacuumed or analyzed
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:25:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:49:33PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Back in the discussion of this someone had mentioned capturing all the
info that you'd get from a vacuum verbose; dead tuples, etc. What do
people think about that? In
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:25:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Isn't this already dealt with by contrib/pg_freespacemap?
AFAIK that does nothing to tell you how much space is desired by
relations.
I thought the latest patch arranged to expose per-relation
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:20:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:25:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Isn't this already dealt with by contrib/pg_freespacemap?
AFAIK that does nothing to tell you how much space is desired by
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After CVS-upping... yes, both lastpagecount and nextpage are now
included. But unfortunately the README says next to nothing about what
they mean...
Yeah, this needs a bit of work ... will have at it.
regards, tom lane
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:49:33PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Back in the discussion of this someone had mentioned capturing all the
info that you'd get from a vacuum verbose; dead tuples, etc. What do
people think about that? In particular I think it'd be handy to know how
many pages vacuum
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 03:54:57PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:49:33PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Back in the discussion of this someone had mentioned capturing all the
info that you'd get from a vacuum verbose; dead tuples, etc. What do
people think
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:49:33PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Back in the discussion of this someone had mentioned capturing all the
info that you'd get from a vacuum verbose; dead tuples, etc. What do
people think about that? In particular I think it'd be handy to know how
many pages vacuum
Greetings,
I've got a patch to be reviewed for having the stats system keep
track of the last
time a table was vacuumed or analyzed either by the user or via
AutoVacuum.
The patch is at:
http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/pg-dev/vacuum-autovacuum-times-stats.diff
I'd appreciate a full review, it
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Greetings,
I've got a patch to be reviewed for having the stats system keep
track of the last
time a table was vacuumed or analyzed either by the user or via
AutoVacuum.
The patch is at:
http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/pg-dev/vacuum-autovacuum-times-stats.diff
I'd
Looks good to me. Short and sweet.
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:18:03PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Greetings,
I've got a patch to be reviewed for having the stats system keep
track of the last
time a table was vacuumed or analyzed either by the user or via
AutoVacuum.
The patch is at:
Back in the discussion of this someone had mentioned capturing all the
info that you'd get from a vacuum verbose; dead tuples, etc. What do
people think about that? In particular I think it'd be handy to know how
many pages vacuum wanted in the FSM vs. how many it got; this would make
it much
12 matches
Mail list logo
