On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
But in the 9.2 branch, the slow phenotype was re-introduced in
1575fbcb795fc331f4, although perhaps the details of who is locking
what differs. I
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a regression introduced in 9.2 that effects the creation and
loading of lots of small tables in a single transaction.
It affects the loading of a pg_dump file which has a large number of
small tables (10,000
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a regression introduced in 9.2 that effects the creation and
loading of lots of small tables in a single transaction.
It affects the
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a regression introduced in 9.2 that effects the creation and
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
But in the 9.2 branch, the slow phenotype was re-introduced in
1575fbcb795fc331f4, although perhaps the details of who is locking
what differs. I haven't yet sorted that out.
It very much does. That commit prevents
There was a regression introduced in 9.2 that effects the creation and
loading of lots of small tables in a single transaction.
It affects the loading of a pg_dump file which has a large number of
small tables (10,000 schemas, one table per schema, 10 rows per
table). I did not test other schema
