> Then what is the point?
We need more information about Cygwin. See Jason Tishler mail forwarded by
Dave Page.
> Don't get me wrong, I would love it if Windows were no longer around. I
> think a cygwin version of PostgreSQL will not further your objective.
> Windows users will not be seeing th
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>
> Le Vendredi 10 Mai 2002 15:33, mlw a écrit :
> > The first time it doesn't work because of anti-virus software, they'll call
> > it junk. When they test performance and see that it sucks, they'll remove
> > the software.
>
> Dear Mark,
>
> PostgreSQL will work well
Le Vendredi 10 Mai 2002 15:33, mlw a écrit :
> The first time it doesn't work because of anti-virus software, they'll call
> it junk. When they test performance and see that it sucks, they'll remove
> the software.
Dear Mark,
PostgreSQL will work well if cygwin.dll is compiled in a separate work
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>
> Dear Mark,
>
> Agreed except for paths (see below). But now that we agree, why not move to
> Windows in three steps:
> 1) Release a minimal Cygwin + PostgreSQL installer,
> 2) Have 100.000 downloads or more Windows developpers,
> 3) Work as a team on a Windows port.
Dear Mark,
Agreed except for paths (see below). But now that we agree, why not move to
Windows in three steps:
1) Release a minimal Cygwin + PostgreSQL installer,
2) Have 100.000 downloads or more Windows developpers,
3) Work as a team on a Windows port.
By the way : Cygwin accepts both Windows
Hi everyone,
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>
> - second move : release a bundle of pgAdmin2 + PostgreSQL on
> http://www.postgresql.org, Bloodshed and other sites.
Don't know if it's useful to know, but a PostgreSQL project got setup on
Sourceforge recently (no CVS), pretty much just so PostgreSQL
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>
> Le Vendredi 10 Mai 2002 14:06, mlw a écrit :
> > Sorry, I'm not interested in a cygwin version of PostgreSQL. I think it
> > will do more harm than good. If we make it something that people want to
> > try, and then they TRY it, they will find that is sucks, then we l
: Re: [HACKERS] pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++
Le Vendredi 10 Mai 2002 14:06, mlw a écrit :
> Sorry, I'm not interested in a cygwin version of PostgreSQL. I think
> it will do more harm than good. If we make it something that people
> want to try, and then they TRY it, they wil
Le Vendredi 10 Mai 2002 14:06, mlw a écrit :
> Sorry, I'm not interested in a cygwin version of PostgreSQL. I think it
> will do more harm than good. If we make it something that people want to
> try, and then they TRY it, they will find that is sucks, then we lose. It
> is very hard to remove the
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> > Without some buy-in from the core team, I'm not sure I am willing to spend
> > my time on it. If someone would be willing to fund the 100 or so man-hours
> > required to do it, then that would be a different story.
>
> I suggest we focuss on providing a minimal Postgr
Le Vendredi 10 Mai 2002 13:13, mlw a écrit :
> I am starting to come to the conclusion that the PostgreSQL group is
> satisfied with cygwin, and the will to create a native Win32 version does
> not exist outside of a few organizations that are paying developers to
> create one.
The more important
11 matches
Mail list logo
