On 12/14/2016 08:52 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
But I understand your concern, so "Rejected" is ok under
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/12/906/
I have a better reason for rejecting this patch: we already have this feature.
rhaas=# select catalog_version_no from pg_control_system();
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Jesper Pedersen
wrote:
> On 12/13/2016 10:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Jesper Pedersen writes:
>>> Attached is a new builtin function that exposes the CATALOG_VERSION_NO
>>> constant under the pg_catversion()
On 12/13/2016 10:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Jesper Pedersen writes:
Attached is a new builtin function that exposes the CATALOG_VERSION_NO
constant under the pg_catversion() function, e.g.
I'm pretty sure that we intentionally didn't expose that, reasoning that
users
Jesper Pedersen writes:
> Attached is a new builtin function that exposes the CATALOG_VERSION_NO
> constant under the pg_catversion() function, e.g.
I'm pretty sure that we intentionally didn't expose that, reasoning that
users should only care about the user-visible
Hi Hackers,
Attached is a new builtin function that exposes the CATALOG_VERSION_NO
constant under the pg_catversion() function, e.g.
test=# SELECT pg_catversion();
pg_catversion
---
201612121
(1 row)
Although it mostly useful during the development cycle to verify if