Re: [HACKERS] pg_client_encoding

2001-10-16 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
Done. Ok, here is the modified encoding table (column1 is the standard name, 2 is our official name, and 3 is alias). If there's no objection, I will change them. ASCII SQL_ASCII UTF-8 UNICODE UTF_8 MULE-INTERNAL MULE_INTERNAL ISO-8859-1LATIN1

Re: [HACKERS] pg_client_encoding

2001-10-14 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
* Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011014 16:05]: ASCII SQL_ASCII UTF-8 UNICODE UTF_8 MULE-INTERNAL MULE_INTERNAL ISO-8859-1 LATIN1 ISO_8859_1 ISO-8859-2 LATIN2 ISO_8859_2

Re: [HACKERS] pg_client_encoding

2001-10-13 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
ASCII SQL_ASCII UTF-8 UNICODE UTF_8 MULE-INTERNAL MULE_INTERNAL ISO-8859-1 LATIN1 ISO_8859_1 ISO-8859-2 LATIN2 ISO_8859_2 ISO-8859-3 LATIN3

Re: [HACKERS] pg_client_encoding

2001-10-11 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
Tatsuo, Did you ever commit this new function? I just tried a 'select pg_client_encoding()' and it told me that there was no such function. This was on sources that I pulled and built two days ago. I was planning on changing the JDBC code to use this function instead of

Re: [HACKERS] pg_client_encoding

2001-09-10 Thread Karel Zak
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 01:46:28PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: Hi, I'm going to add a new function pg_client_encoding returning the current client side encoding name. I know there is a similar functionality already there in PostgreSQL (show client_encoding) but it's pain to handle notice

[HACKERS] pg_client_encoding

2001-09-09 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
Hi, I'm going to add a new function pg_client_encoding returning the current client side encoding name. I know there is a similar functionality already there in PostgreSQL (show client_encoding) but it's pain to handle notice message by a program. Also note that JDBC driver and maybe some other