On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Presumably the point of deprecating the feature is that we'd
eventually remove it. If 4 major releases isn't long enough, what is?
Good point.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Presumably the point of deprecating the feature is that we'd
eventually remove it. If 4 major releases isn't long enough, what is?
Good point.
Unless there are further objections, I think we should go ahead and remove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/24/2010 02:32 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Also, unless Gentoo actually strips the man-page and --help page (which I
do
seriously doubt), I do not see the -X option in the documentation.
--
Joost
Delayed response: No, we don't strip
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:46:47PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Back in 2006, we have this commit:
commit 2b25e1169f44368c120931787628d51731b5cc8c
Author: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
Date:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 00:59:03 -0300 2011:
At a minimum, we should probably also remove -X no-security-label and
-X no-unlogged-table-data, which don't exist in any released versions
(unless you want to count alphas). But considering that this has been
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 00:59:03 -0300 2011:
At a minimum, we should probably also remove -X no-security-label and
-X no-unlogged-table-data, which don't exist in any released versions
(unless you want to count alphas). But considering
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 00:59:03 -0300 2011:
At a minimum, we should probably also remove -X no-security-label and
-X no-unlogged-table-data, which don't exist in any
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 00:59:03 -0300 2011:
At a minimum, we should probably also remove -X no-security-label and
-X no-unlogged-table-data,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Back in 2006, we have this commit:
commit 2b25e1169f44368c120931787628d51731b5cc8c
Author: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
Date: Sat Oct 7 20:59:05 2006 +
The -X option in pg_dump was
Robert Haas wrote:
Back in 2006, we have this commit:
commit 2b25e1169f44368c120931787628d51731b5cc8c
Author: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
Date: Sat Oct 7 20:59:05 2006 +
The -X option in pg_dump was supposed to be a workaround for the lack of
portable long options.
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Back in 2006, we have this commit:
commit 2b25e1169f44368c120931787628d51731b5cc8c
Author: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
Date: ? Sat Oct 7 20:59:05 2006 +
? ? The
Robert Haas wrote:
The existing comment says that -X is deprecated, but that doesn't
make it entirely 100% clear that the code isn't intended to be
further updated
Yeah, Dan recently implemented the DEFERRABLE transaction behavior
which was discussed on the list, so I added a
Back in 2006, we have this commit:
commit 2b25e1169f44368c120931787628d51731b5cc8c
Author: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
Date: Sat Oct 7 20:59:05 2006 +
The -X option in pg_dump was supposed to be a workaround for the lack of
portable long options. But we have had portable long
On Friday 24 December 2010 05:35:26 Robert Haas wrote:
Back in 2006, we have this commit:
commit 2b25e1169f44368c120931787628d51731b5cc8c
Author: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
Date: Sat Oct 7 20:59:05 2006 +
The -X option in pg_dump was supposed to be a workaround for the
14 matches
Mail list logo
