Hello,
If you manually set RPADDING 2 in trgm.h, then it will, but the
allocation probably should use LPADDING/RPADDING to get it right, rather
than assume the max values.
Yes you are right. For RPADDING = 2, the current formula is suitable but for
RPADDING =1, a lot of extra space is
Beena Emerson wrote:
In the pg_trgm module, within function generate_trgm, the memory for trigrams
is allocated as follows:
trg = (TRGM *) palloc(TRGMHDRSIZE + sizeof(trgm) * (slen / 2 + 1) *3);
I have been trying to understand why this is so because it seems to be
allocating more space
On 03/09/2015 02:54 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Beena Emerson wrote:
In the pg_trgm module, within function generate_trgm, the memory for trigrams
is allocated as follows:
trg = (TRGM *) palloc(TRGMHDRSIZE + sizeof(trgm) * (slen / 2 + 1) *3);
I have been trying to understand why this is so
Beena Emerson memissemer...@gmail.com writes:
In the pg_trgm module, within function generate_trgm, the memory for trigrams
is allocated as follows:
trg = (TRGM *) palloc(TRGMHDRSIZE + sizeof(trgm) * (slen / 2 + 1) *3);
I have been trying to understand why this is so because it seems to be
In the pg_trgm module, within function generate_trgm, the memory for trigrams
is allocated as follows:
trg = (TRGM *) palloc(TRGMHDRSIZE + sizeof(trgm) * (slen / 2 + 1) *3);
I have been trying to understand why this is so because it seems to be
allocating more space than that is required.
The
On 03/09/2015 03:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Beena Emerson memissemer...@gmail.com writes:
In the pg_trgm module, within function generate_trgm, the memory for trigrams
is allocated as follows:
trg = (TRGM *) palloc(TRGMHDRSIZE + sizeof(trgm) * (slen / 2 + 1) *3);
I have been trying to
