On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> 0003 is what I really wanted to solve, which was my failure with
>> pg_upgrade. The call to pg_ctl didn't succeed because the binaries
>> didn't match the data directory, thus resulting in this:
>>
>> The error had nothing to do with "trust"
Dan McGee wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> 0003 is what I really wanted to solve, which was my failure with
> >> pg_upgrade. The call to pg_ctl didn't succeed because the binaries
> >> didn't match the data directory, thus resulting in this:
> >>
> >> The error h
Dan McGee wrote:
> Not sure what the normal process is for patches, but I put together a
> few small patches for pg_upgrade after trying to use it earlier today
> and staring a non-helpful error message before I finally figured out
> what was going on.
Thanks for the detailed report and patches.
Not sure what the normal process is for patches, but I put together a
few small patches for pg_upgrade after trying to use it earlier today
and staring a non-helpful error message before I finally figured out
what was going on.
0001 is just a simple typo fix, but didn't want to mix it in with the
