Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
I'm not clear on exactly what you're proposing there, but the thing
I've considered doing is having threads to try to keep a FIFO queue
populated with a configurable transaction mix, while a configurable
number of worker threads
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Why do we have pgbench at all in the first place? Surely we could
rewrite it in plpgsql with proper stored procedures.
pgbench gives you a driver program with the following useful properties:
1) Multiple processes are spawned and each gets its own connection
2) A
Kevin Grittner wrote:
I'm not clear on exactly what you're proposing there, but the thing
I've considered doing is having threads to try to keep a FIFO queue
populated with a configurable transaction mix, while a configurable
number of worker threads pull those transactions off the queue and...
Hello
This isn't very well known because the whole MySQL community fracturing has
impacted their ability to actually release this overhaul--seems like they
spend all their time just trying to add support for each new engine of the
month. I don't even like Lua, yet this still seems like a
Hello
I played with psql extensions two years ago - it can do it
http://okbob.blogspot.com/2009/03/experimental-psql.html
The source code is available on pgfoundry
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2011/4/19 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 06:02:53PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:05:07AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
I played with psql extensions two years ago - it can do it
It's interesting, but it doesn't solve the fundamental problem, which
is to allow every client, not just psql, to do this.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter
2011/4/20 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:05:07AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
I played with psql extensions two years ago - it can do it
It's interesting, but it doesn't solve the fundamental problem, which
is to allow every client, not just psql, to do this.
Excerpts from David Fetter's message of mié abr 20 10:54:56 -0300 2011:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:05:07AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
I played with psql extensions two years ago - it can do it
It's interesting, but it doesn't solve the fundamental problem, which
is to allow
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from David Fetter's message of mié abr 20 10:54:56 -0300 2011:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:05:07AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
I played with psql extensions two years ago - it can do it
It's
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:00:12PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2011/4/20 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:05:07AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
I played with psql extensions two years ago - it can do it
It's interesting, but it doesn't solve the
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from David Fetter's message of mié abr 20 10:54:56 -0300 2011:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:05:07AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 01:35:03PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from David Fetter's message of mié abr 20 10:54:56 -0300 2011:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
It is precisely this kind of issue that leads me to believe it would
be counter-productive to come up with any client-specific hacks.
These definitional issues exist on the server, too, and weren't
considered early enough
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 02:12:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
It is precisely this kind of issue that leads me to believe it would
be counter-productive to come up with any client-specific hacks.
These definitional issues
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:23 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 02:12:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
It is precisely this kind of issue that leads me to believe it would
be counter-productive
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 06:02:53PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Hi,
Today (and previously) I wished that pgbench had a mechanism to help
create simple random databases. For example, I could create a table
tenk and fill it with random stuff like
\setrandom foo 1 1
insert into foo
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Merlin Moncure's message of lun abr 18 18:26:54 -0300 2011:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org
wrote:
begin;
\for iterator 1 1
\setrandom foo 1
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Merlin Moncure's message of lun abr 18 18:26:54 -0300 2011:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
I do think that DO covers a lot of the same territory that could
usefully be addressed by a more powerful backslash-command language in
psql. It's in some ways quite a bit more powerful, because it's
available from any
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. I was wondering if anyone was gung-ho enough about this to
implement some kind of library that both programs could draw on.
It probably wouldn't be super-hard, if we could agree on a rough design.
It seems to me
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. I was wondering if anyone was gung-ho enough about this to
implement some kind of library that both programs could draw on.
It
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar abr 19 13:33:27 -0300 2011:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. I was wondering if anyone was gung-ho enough about this to
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar abr 19 13:33:27 -0300 2011:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Robert Haas
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar abr 19 13:33:27 -0300 2011:
Well, I'm all good with that, too, but am not fired up about either
one to implement it myself. So I think it's going to come down to
what the person doing the work feels
On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 07:22:54 PM Tom Lane wrote:
I generally feel that such a feature would be better off done
server-side --- after all, there's more clients in the world than psql
and pgbench, and not all of them could use a C library even if we had
one. But in either case the coding
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think what that really translates to is I don't want to bother doing
the careful design work that Robert talked about. -1 for that approach.
As someone not doing any of that work, agreed ;-)
I generally feel that such a
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:27:45PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. I was wondering if anyone was gung-ho enough about this to
implement some kind of library that both programs could draw on.
It probably
Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
And for the first-hack-that-comes-to-mind, I find my self
pulling out the named fifo trick all the time, and just leaving my
for/loop/if logic in bash writing SQL commands to the fifo,
occasionally getting psql to write an answer to a file that I then
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
And for the first-hack-that-comes-to-mind, I find my self
pulling out the named fifo trick all the time, and just leaving my
for/loop/if logic in bash writing SQL
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar abr 19 14:22:54 -0300 2011:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar abr 19 13:33:27 -0300 2011:
Well, I'm all good with that, too, but am not fired up about either
one to implement it myself. So I
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar abr 19 14:22:54 -0300 2011:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar abr 19 13:33:27 -0300 2011:
Well, I'm all good
Hi,
Today (and previously) I wished that pgbench had a mechanism to help
create simple random databases. For example, I could create a table
tenk and fill it with random stuff like
\setrandom foo 1 1
insert into foo values (:foo)
Now I have to run this 1 times or something like that.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote:
Hi,
Today (and previously) I wished that pgbench had a mechanism to help
create simple random databases. For example, I could create a table
tenk and fill it with random stuff like
\setrandom foo 1 1
insert
Excerpts from Merlin Moncure's message of lun abr 18 18:26:54 -0300 2011:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org
wrote:
begin;
\for iterator 1 1
\setrandom foo 1 :iterator
insert into foo values (:foo);
\end
commit;
Would something like
34 matches
Mail list logo
