Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> On 03.11.2010 11:34, Greg Stark wrote:
>> I'm actually not nearly so sanguine about this not affecting existing
>> installations. It means, for example, that anyone who has written
>> monitoring scripts that watch the wal position will see behaviour
>> they're not fami
On 03.11.2010 11:34, Greg Stark wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
Back-patch to 9.0. Since this only affects bootstrapping, it makes no
difference to existing installations. We don't need to worry about the
bug in existing installations, because if you've managed
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> Back-patch to 9.0. Since this only affects bootstrapping, it makes no
> difference to existing installations. We don't need to worry about the
> bug in existing installations, because if you've managed to get past the
> initial base backu
