Re: [HACKERS] pgstatindex still throws ERROR: value 3220078592 is out of range for type integer

2010-06-09 Thread Dave Cramer
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp wrote: Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote: I noted on line 169 that max_avail is still an int ? Where else would it be having problems ? It should not a problem because the local variable only stores byte

[HACKERS] pgstatindex still throws ERROR: value 3220078592 is out of range for type integer

2010-06-07 Thread Dave Cramer
I noted on line 169 that max_avail is still an int ? Where else would it be having problems ? Dave -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] pgstatindex still throws ERROR: value 3220078592 is out of range for type integer

2010-06-07 Thread Takahiro Itagaki
Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote: I noted on line 169 that max_avail is still an int ? Where else would it be having problems ? It should not a problem because the local variable only stores byte size in a page. It will be at most only BLCKSZ (=8192). I wonder why you had ERROR: value