Re: [HACKERS] pgxs under Win32 for PL/Java

2004-11-07 Thread Fabien COELHO
Seems you forgot to put a "-I" before the include directive in src/makefiles/Makefile.win32, i.e. change: Indeed. but in other respects, the patch seems to work fine on win32. I'll test Cygwin next. Ok. Thanks for your test and debug. -- Fabien Coelho - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [HACKERS] pgxs under Win32 for PL/Java

2004-11-07 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Fabien, The problem described in the recent thread "cygwin build failure" prevents me from building on Cygwin at present. I'll await a patch for that. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, pleas

Re: [HACKERS] pgxs under Win32 for PL/Java

2004-11-07 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Fabien, Seems you forgot to put a "-I" before the include directive in src/makefiles/Makefile.win32, i.e. change: override CPPFLAGS+= $(includedir_server)/port/win32 to: override CPPFLAGS+= -I$(includedir_server)/port/win32 but in other respects, the patch seems to work fine on win32. I'll test

Re: [HACKERS] pgxs under Win32 for PL/Java

2004-11-07 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Fabien COELHO wrote: I have no mean to test that on a win32 machine. Could you do it? Sure, I'll test it sometime tomorrow or the day after. I'll get back to you. I'm wondering whether the MAKE_DLL fix should also be done under cygwin. Any opinion? I can test cygwin too. But just out of curio

[HACKERS] pgxs under Win32 for PL/Java

2004-11-07 Thread Fabien COELHO
Dear Thomas, > I'm trying to change the Makefile system for PL/Java so that it uses > PGXS instead of compiling using a complete PostgreSQL source tree. As it > turns out, the directory "include/port/win32" is not present in the > PostgreSQL binary installation. Without it, it's not possible to c