Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand. However I have another dumb idea/question - It seems to me
that it
is client code. I think that it should be integrated into psql
command.
That doesn't seem like a particularly
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand. However I have another dumb idea/question - It seems to me that it
is client code. I think that it should be integrated into psql
command.
That doesn't seem like a particularly appropriate thing to do ... nor
do I see
Am Wednesday, 23. July 2008 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
Is it fixed only on head or do you plan to backported to older branch as
well?
I don't see a need to backport this. The only difference is that now you will
get an error if no tclsh is found. The call configure TCLSH=... is the
same in all
Am Tuesday, 22. July 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, I looked deeply on our solaris build script and problem is with
following configure setup:
./configure --prefix=/tmp/pg --with-tcl --with-tclconfig=/usr/sfw/lib
It found tclconfig, but not tclsh
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, these programs start with
package require Pgtcl
but we don't provide that library. Should that bother us?
Hmm. The scripts actually depend on both pltcl and Pgtcl, so just
pushing them out to the Pgtcl package wouldn't really improve
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, these programs start with
package require Pgtcl
but we don't provide that library. Should that bother us?
Hmm. The scripts actually depend on both pltcl and Pgtcl, so just
pushing them out to the Pgtcl package
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Actually it looks like it's been a very long time since these scripts
got any love anyway. There's no reason anymore to split modules into
multiple rows (not since TOAST...) and they're not schema-safe either.
Anybody feel like
Am Tuesday, 22. July 2008 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
By main opinion main problem is in build process which does not fail and
also dependency on tclsh is hidden by exec command.
Fixed. Now, configure will fail if no tcl shell is found. You can specify
one with the TCLSH variable.
--
Sent via
Peter Eisentraut napsal(a):
Am Tuesday, 22. July 2008 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
By main opinion main problem is in build process which does not fail and
also dependency on tclsh is hidden by exec command.
Fixed. Now, configure will fail if no tcl shell is found. You can specify
one with the
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Actually it looks like it's been a very long time since these scripts
got any love anyway. There's no reason anymore to split modules into
multiple rows (not since TOAST...) and they're not schema-safe either.
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand. However I have another dumb idea/question - It seems to me that
it
is client code. I think that it should be integrated into psql
command.
That doesn't seem like a particularly appropriate thing to do ... nor
do I see the argument for
Commands pltcl_listmod, pltcl_delmod, pltcl_loadmod does not work on Solaris 10,
because there is not present tclsh. Unfortunately build process substitute path
to shell with empty string which invokes infinite loop.
See diff between S10 and Nevada:
bash-3.00# head
Zdenek Kotala napsal(a):
Commands pltcl_listmod, pltcl_delmod, pltcl_loadmod does not work on
Solaris 10, because there is not present tclsh.
I found that tclsh is available on solaris 10 in /usr/sfw/bin and its name is
tclsh8.3.
Zdenek
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Commands pltcl_listmod, pltcl_delmod, pltcl_loadmod does not work on Solaris
10,
because there is not present tclsh.
Shouldn't this bug be filed against Solaris' clearly-broken tcl
installation?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Commands pltcl_listmod, pltcl_delmod, pltcl_loadmod does not work on Solaris 10,
because there is not present tclsh.
Shouldn't this bug be filed against Solaris' clearly-broken tcl
installation?
I'm not able to make decision if
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But problem is also in configure which does not fail when tclsh is not
found.
Yes it does ...
if test $[#] -eq 0; then
test -z $TCLSH AC_MSG_ERROR([unable to locate tclConfig.sh because
no Tcl shell was found])
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But problem is also in configure which does not fail when tclsh is not
found.
Yes it does ...
if test $[#] -eq 0; then
test -z $TCLSH AC_MSG_ERROR([unable to locate tclConfig.sh because
no Tcl shell was found])
Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But problem is also in configure which does not fail when tclsh is not
found.
Yes it does ...
if test $[#] -eq 0; then
test -z $TCLSH AC_MSG_ERROR([unable to locate tclConfig.sh because
no Tcl shell was found])
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, I looked deeply on our solaris build script and problem is with
following
configure setup:
./configure --prefix=/tmp/pg --with-tcl --with-tclconfig=/usr/sfw/lib
It found tclconfig, but not tclsh
Ah. So actually there is a bug in our
19 matches
Mail list logo
