Re: [HACKERS] postmaster core dump

2005-09-19 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:59:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I seem to have an unhappy postgresql: > > Let's see a test case, not a stack trace. I haven't set up the minimalist test case yet, but the 2 tables involved are incredibly simple. stats.id i

Re: [HACKERS] postmaster core dump

2005-09-19 Thread Tom Lane
Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I seem to have an unhappy postgresql: Let's see a test case, not a stack trace. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore yo

Re: [HACKERS] postmaster core dump

2005-09-19 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 06:12:54PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: > #15 0x081a4c2f in exec_simple_query ( > query_string=0x834501c "select timesliced, count(stats_id) from trans > left j I just truncated one line early.. the query was: # explain select timesliced, count(stats_id) from trans le

[HACKERS] postmaster core dump

2005-09-19 Thread Patrick Welche
I seem to have an unhappy postgresql: (gdb) bt #0 0xbd99871b in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12 #1 0xbda217e7 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12 #2 0x0820c1fa in ExceptionalCondition ( conditionName=0x8298920 "!(batchno > hashtable->curbatch)", errorType=0x823919f "FailedAssertion",