On tis, 2012-04-10 at 17:48 -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> > Hmm, but now you've set it up so that you can complete ALTER ROLE
> foo
> > WITH WITH. Were you aware of that?
>
> D'oh, I overlooked that. Attached is v2: the diff is a tad lengthier
> now, but that should fix it.
Committed.
--
S
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2012-04-03 at 22:34 -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> I noticed psql's tab-completion for 'WITH' is a bit overeager. If you
>> try to tab-complete commands like:
>> ALTER ROLE jsmith WITH [TAB]
>> COPY tbl FROM 'filename' WITH
On tis, 2012-04-03 at 22:34 -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> I noticed psql's tab-completion for 'WITH' is a bit overeager. If you
> try to tab-complete commands like:
> ALTER ROLE jsmith WITH [TAB]
> COPY tbl FROM 'filename' WITH [TAB]
>
> you'll get 'RECURSIVE' unhelpfully filled in. I think
Hi all,
I noticed psql's tab-completion for 'WITH' is a bit overeager. If you
try to tab-complete commands like:
ALTER ROLE jsmith WITH [TAB]
COPY tbl FROM 'filename' WITH [TAB]
you'll get 'RECURSIVE' unhelpfully filled in. I think 'RECURSIVE'
should only be suggested if 'WITH' is the first a
