On 31 July 2010 07:58, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
(There is still a small, side issue with numeric_maximum_size() which
I plan to fix, but this patch is the good
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
This version looks fine to me.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
This version looks fine to me.
Excellent. Committed.
--
Robert Haas
Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
(There is still a small, side issue with numeric_maximum_size() which
I plan to fix, but this patch is the good stuff.)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The
