On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
It's awfully late in the release cycle, but how about we add another
digit to the filenames used by SLRU, to up the limit?
It's way too late for that kind of
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
So, speaking of that, aren't we supposed to wrap beta2 any minute now?
Yes. I'm expecting to do it this evening.
There are two open items listed on the open items page as blockers for beta2:
- error in information_schema.element_types view
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:27, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
So, speaking of that, aren't we supposed to wrap beta2 any minute now?
Yes. I'm expecting to do it this evening.
There are two open items listed on the open items page as blockers for
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
aren't we supposed to wrap beta2 any minute now?
There are two open items listed on the open items page as blockers
for beta2:
- error in information_schema.element_types view definition (bug
5926)
- more
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
The other pending patch relates to the false positives serialization
failures and funny-looking pg_lock entries from not ignoring
non-MVCC snapshots in SSI. I don't think Dan had any problem with
the patch I offered, but I wasn't sure what to
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
There is this pending patch, without which there are infrequent
conditions under which the users could get a LOG level message and
accumulate files in pg_serial:
On 09.06.2011 17:46, Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Grittnerkevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
The other pending patch relates to the false positives serialization
failures and funny-looking pg_lock entries from not ignoring
non-MVCC snapshots in SSI. I don't think Dan had any problem with
the patch
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
One other problem I'm realizing: didn't Peter ask Bruce to revert the
change to make pg_upgrade ignore case differences in locale names, on
the grounds that it was not safe?
There was a hypothesis that it wasn't safe, but no very clear evidence
either
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
There is this pending patch, without which there are infrequent
conditions under which the users could get a LOG level message
and accumulate files in pg_serial:
Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
One other problem I'm realizing: didn't Peter ask Bruce to revert the
change to make pg_upgrade ignore case differences in locale names, on
the grounds that it was not safe?
There was a hypothesis that it wasn't safe, but no very
10 matches
Mail list logo
