Re: [HACKERS] request for enhancement of protocol

2005-11-19 Thread Hans-Jürgen Schönig
i think if the protocol is enhanced again we should also consider adding protocol level support for RESET CONNECTION. i have sent this patch some time ago but i think it is not worth to do the remaining protocol level changes (sql level support is finished) if this is the only change on the pr

Re: [HACKERS] request for enhancement of protocol

2005-11-19 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 12:40:23PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > >What do you mean? There are already 10 levels for elog, including five > >levels of DEBUG. How many more do you want? > > sometimes I need show only some text. Now I get stack info. > lighter elog ~ sending text, not. proc, st

Re: [HACKERS] request for enhancement of protocol

2005-11-19 Thread Pavel Stehule
What do you mean? There are already 10 levels for elog, including five levels of DEBUG. How many more do you want? sometimes I need show only some text. Now I get stack info. lighter elog ~ sending text, not. proc, stack info. > 2. multi result sets. This is necessery for support procedure

Re: [HACKERS] request for enhancement of protocol

2005-11-19 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:07:58AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hello > > Meybe is time for some changes. Maybe. I haven't courage for it. But maybe > is good time for discussion. What I miss in protocol? > > 1. debug. support + other level for elog. Current elog is too heavy > (sometimes) W

[HACKERS] request for enhancement of protocol

2005-11-19 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello Meybe is time for some changes. Maybe. I haven't courage for it. But maybe is good time for discussion. What I miss in protocol? 1. debug. support + other level for elog. Current elog is too heavy (sometimes) 2. multi result sets. This is necessery for support procedures in DB2, MySQL