On May 29, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:03 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com
wrote:
On May 29, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
a) the ability to push a schema onto the current search path
b) the ability to pull a schema off the current search
Greg,
Do we really? The only reason people are having trouble managing their
search_path is because they're not using it as intended and putting
things in lots of different schemas that they intend to all be
visible.
Apparently you've never adminned a database with hundreds (or thousands)
of
On May 29, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
a) the ability to push a schema onto the current search path
b) the ability to pull a schema off the current search path
push, pop, shift, unshift. :-)
Come to think of it, I want these for arrays, too. ;-)
Best,
David
--
Sent via
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:03 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote:
On May 29, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
a) the ability to push a schema onto the current search path
b) the ability to pull a schema off the current search path
push, pop, shift, unshift. :-)
Come to
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Sometimes one needs to use schemas just for namespacing (they are called
namespaces after all), and not for security or visibility.
What's the point of namespaces if not to implement visibility? The
interesting thing to do
